Maybe switching to Pro for home might work but again, I am not sure if I would stay with you now. Moving to Carbonite doesn't sound like an option based on how much storage I would need. I have somewhere between 5 and 6 TB of data backed up from my home machine. What incentive do I have and the business I work for have for staying with you? Your product has worked so well for us but now you are asking us to leave. Talk about a double whammy! Crash Plan, you have basically cut my business and myself off at the knees here. Earlier this year, they announce that they will no longer support running their product on a Server OS, and now they are telling me I cant use their product at home. I'm sure I am not the only one in this boat but my company has been using Crash Plan Pro for backing up our file servers and I have been using Crash Plan Home for my computer at home. Plain duplication covers none of these issues, and while it is handy if someone steals my PC, or for me to look at my cat videos on multiple devices, it's not a real business solution. A dead disk or blown server or RAID array means loading all the good stuff into new equipment. One needs to be able to restore to other than the original location.Backups are typically periodic snapshots, as opposed to realtime backup so that if things like ransomware do come along, it's possible to stop backups before uploading infected files, or versioning is in place, or some vendors claim to be able to spot infected files and block their uploading.Files deleted on the host PC are never deleted in the cloud backup system (or onsite backup, for that matter).The ability to carry some number of versions of a file to be able to restore to an earlier point.Infected and encrypted ransomware files are copied into the cloud as well, leaving me with no clean files to get back.Ī true backup system has to have the following characteristics:.A file deleted inadvertently on the PC is also deleted in the cloud with no way to get it back.There is no versioning of files to allow me to go back and get an earlier version if a user overwrites a file. But, it, like other file duplication products, leaves me with several serious deficiencies. OneDrive is indeed a copy of the same file in another location. I've used the free version for years, and considered paid versions, but really, just have not needed the additional features.īackup is not quite that simple. Someone else mentioned versioning, which is a feature of backup, obviously good, and supported by Syncback paid versions.īTW, I have no financial ties to Syncback. It may not be offsite/cloud backup by itself, but it's still backup. Backup, in its simplest form, is as a copy of the same file in a different location. In most cases, you should install babel-plugin-transform-runtime as a development dependency (with -save-dev).Regarding SyncBack, one said it wasn't backup. See the technical details section for more information on how this works and the types of transformations that occur. The transformer will alias these built-ins to core-js so you can use them seamlessly without having to require the polyfill. While this might be ok for an app or a command line tool, it becomes a problem if your code is a library which you intend to publish for others to use or if you can't exactly control the environment in which your code will run. If you use babel-polyfill and the built-ins it provides such as Promise, Set and Map, those will pollute the global scope. The runtime will be compiled into your build.Īnother purpose of this transformer is to create a sandboxed environment for your code. This is where the transform-runtime plugin comes in: all of the helpers will reference the module babel-runtime to avoid duplication across your compiled output. This duplication is sometimes unnecessary, especially when your application is spread out over multiple files. By default this will be added to every file that requires it. Why?īabel uses very small helpers for common functions such as _extend. NOTE: Instance methods such as "foobar".includes("foo") will not work since that would require modification of existing builtins (Use babel-polyfill for that). (This plugin is recommended in a library/tool) Externalise references to helpers and builtins, automatically polyfilling your code without polluting globals.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |